Photo by 'cybrarian77'

Photograph by 'cybrarian77'

In order to qualify for a waiver from some of the most onerous provisions of the No Kid Left Behind (NCLB) law, California would have to introduce new teacher and principal evaluation systems linked to student examination scores in thousands of California schools that receive federal Title 1 funds by the 2014-15 school year.

As a outcome of deep unhappiness with many aspects of the constabulary, the Obama administration is inviting states to employ for waivers from the police. Only federal officials are making it articulate that if California were to apply for a waiver, it would have to fully implement whatever program it submits by the 2014-15 school yr.

That was the message that Interim Assistant Secretary Michael Yudin in the U.S. Department of Education brought from Washington to the State Lath of Education coming together in Sacramento last week.

Board president Michael Kirst had invited Yudin to appear before the state lath to explain what exactly the federal government's expectations were in regards to applying for a waiver.

Remarkably, Yudin was unable to tell the state lath what the consequences for California would be if it failed to implement everything independent in its programme were it to apply for the waiver.

The waiver the Obama administration is offering would offer all kinds of incentives to states and schools. It would, for example, suspend the requirements whereby states have to prepare "annual measurable objectives" that schools and districts must see. But the U.S. Department of Educational activity would besides require states to implement a slew of provisions to get these benefits, including the teacher and principle evaluation requirements.

At its previous meeting in November, the State Lath of Pedagogy reviewed a report by the California Department of Education, which estimated that complying with the waiver requirements could price the state nearly $3 billion.

The costs of the waiver, along with the requirements demanded by the Obama assistants to receive it, has prompted the California Teachers Association (CTA) to abet against California applying for the waiver, despite pressures to exercise then from numerous school superintendents who are finding that growing numbers of their schools are being labeled as failing nether the police force. "They should salve states of the onerous requirements of NCLB, and not supercede it with more than onerous requirements," CTA vice president Eric Heins told EdSource.

Yudin said that the intent of granting waivers from NCLB—which marked its 10th anniversary terminal Sunday—is to give states maximum flexibility in coming up with their ain accountability systems over the next twelvemonth or two until Congress is able to break the gridlock it is in and become effectually to reauthorizing the law.

Currently, ever larger numbers of schools are not meeting those objectives, and are being labeled as in need of "program comeback," or finer, "failing" under the law. In this school year, some 63 percent, or nearly 4,000 out of but over half dozen,000 schools receiving federal Title ane funds for poor children, are labeled as beingness in "plan comeback."

"We are taking the pressure off, and giving you the space you demand," Yudin said, emphasizing that "the best ideas do non come from Washington, they come from the ground…We want to aid states meet our principles while they practice what they have to do."

But if Yudin was attempting to assuage people'south fears nearly what it will accept to use for waiver, on several issues he may accept done just the opposite. Even as he was saying states would have dandy flexibility, he laid out requirements that would seem extraordinarily hard for California to reach—especially in the most controversial requirement of linking teacher evaluations to student test scores.

To do and then would require new collective bargaining agreements with teachers in most districts. Only the California Teachers Association is opposed to including test scores as office of teacher evaluations, if those evaluations are used used for promotions, and hiring and firing, as they currently are. That opposition makes the likelihood of and then many schools and districts in the state being able to introduce the kind of evaluation system being promoted past the Obama assistants a virtual impossibility.

"We would exist exchanging i prepare of bad mandates for another set of bad mandates," CTA vice president Eric Heins told EdSource. He said that student test scores could be used to help "improve a instructor's practice" merely that it would exist "inappropriate to use them to make high stakes decisions about hiring and firing and promotions." Several leading scholars and statisticians accept made a similar argument, pointing to the flaws in the "value added" methodology that is typically used to tie educatee examination scores to the performance of individual teachers.

Instead, Heins said, the focus should be on getting Congress to reauthorize the current police. Although that is already five years overdue, there is now some hope that reauthorization could occur, but only after the 2022 presidential elections—with whatsoever luck in 2022 or 2014. Any law Congress ends up authorizing could render some or all of thechanges California would make in lodge to qualify for the Obama administration'south waiver obsolete even before it gets off the footing. "It doesn't brand any sense," Heins said.

To at-home anxieties, Yudin notes that the administration's teacher evaluation requirement for obtaining a waiver simply specifies that pupil test scores incorporate "a significant gene" of the evaluation, not how significant a factor it should be. That would be left up to us to decide. For example, in the waiver applications received so far, one state says student exam scores should comprise one-half of the evaluation score, he said, while others similar Massachusetts don't fifty-fifty assign a weight to it.

State Board of Education vice-president Trish Williams asked Yudin what would happen if "in a worst case scenario" California was granted a waiver, and and then for any number of reasons could not acquit out all its conditions. "If ii years from at present nosotros don't get to one thousand districts, are yous going to undo the waivers?" she asked. "Do we get penalized? Exercise we just stop? What?"

Yudin was unable to answer the question as to what would occur. The federal government had not set a policy to deal with that eventuality. "Regarding what steps we volition take a few years down the route, I can't reply that," he said.

He said the waiver—and its accompanying requirements—are not intended to exist permanent, or to exist an end run around Congress. "This is not meant to be a reauthorizing (of NCLB), it is meant just to requite some flexibility to states," he said.

The experience of states who were awarded Race to the Top funds suggests that California would have good reason to exist wary near its ability to fully implement a program requiring a revamping of the state'southward teacher evaluation system, and implementing a new 1 covering school principals—and what the federal regime might do were the state unable to exercise so.

Earlier this month, U.S. Secretary of Teaching Arne Duncan issued a report documenting that three out of the xi states that were awarded Race to the Pinnacle funds, including New York, are having meaning difficulties carrying out the requirements of the grant. Implementing the teacher evaluation requirement has proven especially problematic.

"Backtracking on reform commitments could cost the state hundreds of millions of dollars for improving New York schools," Duncan said.

Lath president Kirst raised some other business organization: the requirement that main evaluation systems be tied to students' test scores. "California has no statewide policy for principal evaluation," he said.  "We would have to outset from scratch."

But Assistant Secretarial assistant Yudin did not back down: states are required to implement all aspects of their plans. As he put it, at that place will exist "no free pass."

"California is a big state," the California Teachers Association's Heins countered. "We should be able to decide how best to evaluate our teachers."

For arguments on both sides of the instructor evaluation debate, see today's New York Times colloquium.

To become more reports like this ane, click here to sign up for EdSource's no-cost daily email on latest developments in instruction.